Category Archives: Layout
Although we installed this a few months ago, we have only just got around to installed the glass side to the dog shower. The shower is in the boot room and intended for washing the dog and boots when the occasion calls. It is a normal shower with a shower tray that has a silt trap. This is intended to stop the shower outlet from getting blocked up with mud off the dog or any wellies that get washed here.
The challenge was the glass side that was required for the side. We didn’t want (or need) a screen that was full height. However, we do need a screen to keep the water from the electric sockets that are close by. The answer was to order some glass specifically for the job. Probably is, it isn’t cheap. We used 10mm glass that is tempered with polished edges and also has a radius on the top outer corner. All of this pushes up the price. This single piece of glass was around £150. To make sure that the size was exactly right, we cut a template out of cardboard. This enabled us to get the fit exactly right (as it turned out, the glass needed to be about 2mm out of square. Because the glass is tempered, it cannot be cut locally. It was ordered through Huddersfield Plate Glass who have provided us with our other glass and mirrors in the property.
To attached the glass to the wall, we used some specialist “U” channel. This came with silicone seals and is made to fit 10mm glass. We had to cut it to length, but it does the job. The metal strip is screwed to the wall and the glass simply pushes in. The back of the “U” channel has clear silicone applied to it and there is also a layer of clear silicone holding the bottom of the glass against the shower tray. The “U” channel had to be ordered. It was supplied by Kudos shower accessories. Cost was about £30.
One of the things that has surprised me is that a number of decisions need to be made so quickly. Here’s an example…..the kitchen.
The concrete slab has yet to be laid in the new extension. This includes the slab for the kitchen. You can see the current state of the build in the photo below.
To be able to get the pipework in the right place in the concrete, we need to understand the layout in the kitchen. We have really had to move quickly over the next few weeks and have just placed the order for the kitchen. While the finishes may change, the layout is pretty set. We have used the layout to define where the pipework should go in the concrete slab.
There is a 75mm layout of insulation to go on top of the slab and then another 75mm of screed. The screed will contain the underfloor heating pipes. You can put the water feeds into the insulation layer, however, we have put the cold water supply (blue pipe in the photo) inside a brown plastic waste pipe. By putting the cold water supply into the concrete slab, we avoid the cold water from being warmed up by the underfloor heating.
The kitchen design has been done by KC Design in Clayton West – again, we are using another local firm. The kitchen is bespoke and will be produced here in Yorkshire. Now we have sorted out the layout, we can relax a little bit as it will be the back end of the year before we are ready to install it. Lots of decisions to be made between now and then.
With Phase 2 of the construction fast approaching, it is time to start sorting out the details of how the roof trusses and internal windows are going to work. Phase 2 is the building of an extension onto the existing property and will house the kitchen, lounge, master bedroom, two en suite bathrooms, a boot room and a utility room.
The roof line will be level, but because the ground rises up the inside ceiling height will decrease as you move through the extension. The kitchen is double height, the lounge one and a half height and the bedroom normal height. The roof trusses will be exposed as in the existing part of the property and there will be extensive use of roof lights.
The proposal is that the roof trusses will be made of oak and made in the same traditional way (tenon joints with oak pegs) rather than using any metal plates or straps. There has been some debate about the exact placement of the beams and how “open” the space should be between the kitchen and the lounge. We have opted for a semi-open approach with a large slot for a door way and another large opening behind the seating area. The very last 3D drawing in this blog attempts to illustrate this.
Here are the architect’s drawings of the elevations of the existing property. I think they have done a great job, but there again I am always a sucker for these sort of engineering drawings! You can zoom in by clicking on the images.
My hand drawings are elsewhere on the blog, so these just go to show how bad my drawings really are! I didn’t want to publish any of this material until after we had completed on the purchase – it seemed to be tempting fate otherwise.
|Left hand end|
|Right hand end|
Since we bought the property before any estate agents details were produced, these are the first floor plans of the property that we have seen. We have been working off some of the rough sketches that I did using Google Maps as a source for the overall size and shape of the property.
You can see quite clearly the outline of the three original cottages with the middle one being smaller than the two adjoining. Interestingly, this fact is also borne out by the census records that show that the middle property consisted of just two rooms – one up and one down. These days it is difficult to imagine bringing up a family in such a property.
I didn’t want to publish any of this information until we had exchanged – it seemed to be tempting fate otherwise.
Here’s a couple of drawings of the farmhouse as it is today. The second drawing shows the property in less detail, but labels up the different parts that go to make up the building. You will find photos of the property here.
The cottages were originally three cottages (8, 9 and 10 Hagg Leys). It was only in the 1990s that numbers 9 and 10 were converted into one property – known as 10 Hagg Leys today. We plan to join all three cottages together and connect it to the barn.
|Drawing of the property today|
|The different parts that make up the property|
Well, now I have an accurate set of floor plans, I can compare the estimates that I worked out using Google Maps (see previous post).
I estimated the overall size of the buildings (including the barn) to be around 20 feet by 80 feet. The floor plans (and the topo survey) show that the building is in fact 22 feet by 82 feet. Remarkably close to the Google Map estimate. I tried a few other measurements that I had taken and they are all within about 10% of the actual measurement – this is particularly the case with longer measurements. It is pretty scary about how much detail you can glean from these satellite images.